Technical committee

Technical board 2021 August 2025-XNUMX May XNUMX

Minutes, 2.6.2025
Meeting number

6/2025

Aika

02.06.2025 16.30 - 18.10

Place

Puumila

Minutes inspection

Yes, checked and found to be in accordance with the meeting's procedure.
02.06.2025

Minutes available for viewing

Puumila
03.06.2025

Signatory's name

Reijo Valiharju
Technical director

§ 54 Legality and quorum of the meeting
Proposal for a decision

The legality and quorum of the meeting are established. The participants in the meeting are noted.

Meeting handling of the matter

The meeting was declared legal and had a quorum. The participants in the meeting were noted.

Decision

The motion for a resolution was adopted unanimously.

§ 55 Selection of the minutes inspectors
Proposal for a decision

Two minutes reviewers will be elected. In accordance with the agreed practice, the reviewers will be Erja Silvennoinen and Ulla Vierre. The minutes will be reviewed on November 13, 2024 and will be available for viewing on November 14, 2024 on the municipality's information network.

Decision

The motion for a resolution was adopted unanimously.

§ 56 Status report of the Myyränkankaa wind power project

The proposal for the partial master plan for the Myyränkankaa wind farm has been modified as presented at the previous meeting of the Technical Committee, so in this respect it would be possible to continue processing the partial master plan proposal.

The Myyränkankaa wind farm is a single entity located in the area of ​​two municipalities. The partial master plan for the wind farm is being prepared as a single entity, which makes it justified to hold it on display and the related public presentation as simultaneously as possible for both municipalities. According to information received from the city of Virtai, the partial master plan for their municipality will not be held on display until the autumn, so it is not currently possible to determine when the plan will be held on display. For this reason, the processing of the proposal for the partial master plan for the Myyränkankaa wind farm is currently not possible.

Proposal for a decision

The status report of the Myyränkankaa wind farm is noted for information.

Decision

The motion for a resolution was adopted unanimously.

For your information

Municipal board

§ 57 Korpilahti waterfront development plan proposal

After the previous hearing, the Provincial Museum's statement required a detailed archaeological inventory. The applicant has commissioned the inventory from Mikroliitti Oy.
Based on the inventory, no changes are needed to the waterfront site plan, as no archaeological sites have been found. The fieldwork appears to be sufficiently comprehensive.

Proposal for a decision

The technical committee approves the plan proposal and submits it to the municipal government and municipal council for approval.

Decision

The motion for a resolution was adopted unanimously.

For your information

Municipal government, municipal council

§ 58 Application for derogation / Holiday home

Construction site and its location:

The construction site is 2560 m2 in size. existing The construction site, whose property code is 250-401-5-75, borders Lake Kankarinjärvi for approximately 62 meters.

Station diagram as accompanying material.

Suggested action:

A derogation is being sought for the construction of a new 80 m2 recreational building. The applicant wants to build a new recreational building in place of the old one and demolish the old 27 m2 recreational building. The new recreational building will be located 20 meters from the shoreline.

Construction status:

There is an existing leisure building of 27 m2 on the construction site. In addition, there is a sauna building of 17 m2 and a storage building of 23 m2 on the construction site.

Prohibitions, restrictions and schematic situation:

There is no valid waterfront plan or partial master plan in the area that could be used as a basis for granting a building permit. In this case, the regulations and instructions of the valid building regulations of the municipality of Kihniö will apply to the construction. According to section 7.2 of the building regulations, the building right for a property under 5000 m2 is 125 m2 of so-called warm space (leisure building, sauna, barn) + 30 m2 of cold storage space + 30 m2 of roof space + 16 m2 of smoke sauna. The buildings must be located in relation to the shore in such a way that the distance from the shoreline to buildings other than saunas must be at least 20 meters.

Consulting neighbors:

The neighbors have nothing to complain about. (Section 63 of the Housing Act)

Justifications for the requirement for deviation:

According to Section 57 of the Building Act, the municipality has the power to deviate. For a special reason, the municipality may grant permission to deviate from a provision, order, prohibition or other restriction provided for in the Land Use Act or issued pursuant to it and from a provision, order, prohibition or other restriction provided for in this Act or issued pursuant to it.

However, the above provisions do not apply to eligibility requirements, plot division, the need for and conditions for a landscape work permit, or the conditions for placement in a planning area regarding the preparation of a local plan as provided for in section 46, subsection 1, paragraph 2. A permit to deviate from other conditions for placement in a planning area may be granted.

However, the permit referred to in subsection 1 above may not be granted if it:

1) causes harm to zoning, the implementation of the plan or other organisation of the use of areas;

2) makes it difficult to achieve nature conservation objectives;

3) makes it difficult to achieve the objectives of protecting the built environment;

4) leads to construction with significant impacts or otherwise causes significant adverse environmental or other impacts.

The current built-up floor area of ​​the property is 67 m2. With the construction of the new leisure building, the built-up floor area of ​​the property would be 120 m2.

The construction adapts to the coastal landscape and other environments. The deviation does not cause harm to the landscape values ​​of the area or to nature and water protection. The deviation does not cause harm to zoning, the implementation of the plan or other organization of the use of areas. The deviation also does not lead to construction with a significant impact or otherwise cause significant harmful environmental or other impacts.

Prepared by: building inspector Raisa Karinsalo

Proposal for a decision

The technical committee decides to propose to the municipal government that the deviation be granted and sends the decision to the municipal government for approval. The construction must comply with the provisions and regulations of the current Wastewater Decree. The deviation permit decision is valid for 1 year, during which time a construction permit corresponding to the deviation permit must be initiated. The deviation permit decision must be attached to the construction permit application.

Decision

The motion for a resolution was adopted unanimously.

For your information

Municipal board

§ 59 Application for exemption / economic building

Construction site and its location:

The construction site is a 3840 m2 construction site with property code 250-407-4-39. The construction site borders Lake Kankarinjärvi for approximately 146 meters.

Station diagram as accompanying material.

Suggested action:

A deviation is being applied for for the construction of a new 29,8 thousand m2 farm building. The applicant wants to build a new farm building 20 meters closer to the shoreline than specified in the Hurstinlahti-Kuttiniemi coastal plan. The new farm building would be located 16 meters from the shoreline, i.e. 4 meters closer than specified in the coastal plan. The applicant argues that in this case there would be no need to fell large trees under the building and the soil is suitable for construction.

Construction status:

There is an existing leisure building of 49 m2 on the construction site. In addition, there is a sauna building of 10 m2 and a wood storage building/woodshed. The total built-up floor area of ​​the property after the construction of the outbuilding would be 90 m2.

Prohibitions, restrictions and schematic situation:

The Hurstinlahti-Kuttiniemenranta local plan is in force in the area, which stipulates that buildings other than saunas must be located at least 20 meters from the shoreline. Buildings built in the coastal plan area must be suitable for nature in terms of shape, material and colors.

Consulting neighbors:

The neighbors have nothing to complain about. (Section 63 of the Housing Act)

Justifications for the requirement for deviation:

According to Section 57 of the Building Act, the municipality has the power to deviate. For a special reason, the municipality may grant permission to deviate from a provision, order, prohibition or other restriction provided for in the Land Use Act or issued pursuant to it and from a provision, order, prohibition or other restriction provided for in this Act or issued pursuant to it.

However, the above provisions do not apply to eligibility requirements, plot division, the need for and conditions for a landscape work permit, or the conditions for placement in a planning area regarding the preparation of a local plan as provided for in section 46, subsection 1, paragraph 2. A permit to deviate from other conditions for placement in a planning area may be granted.

However, the permit referred to in subsection 1 above may not be granted if it:

1) causes harm to zoning, the implementation of the plan or other organisation of the use of areas;

2) makes it difficult to achieve nature conservation objectives;

3) makes it difficult to achieve the objectives of protecting the built environment;

4) leads to construction with significant impacts or otherwise causes significant adverse environmental or other impacts.

The construction adapts to the coastal landscape and other environments. The deviation does not cause harm to the landscape values ​​of the area or to nature and water protection. The deviation does not cause harm to zoning, the implementation of the plan or other organization of the use of areas. The deviation also does not lead to construction with a significant impact or otherwise cause significant harmful environmental or other impacts.

Prepared by: building inspector Raisa Karinsalo

Proposal for a decision

The technical committee decides to propose to the municipal board that the deviation be granted and sends the decision to the municipal board for approval. The exterior of the building must be designed to fit into the landscape and the color must be darker. The deviation permit decision is valid for 1 year, during which time a construction permit corresponding to the deviation permit must be initiated. The deviation permit decision must be attached to the construction permit application.

Decision

The motion for a resolution was adopted unanimously.

For your information

Municipal board

§ 60 Application for exemption / holiday home and warehouse

Construction site and its location:

The construction site is a 3990 m2 property called Ylikoski, whose property code is 250-407-14-67. The property is located in an unzoned waterfront area and borders Lake Nerkoo. 36 meters away.

Station drawing as accompanying material.

Suggested action:

An exemption is being sought for the construction of a 100 m2 leisure building and a 30 m2 storage building.

Construction status:

The property is undeveloped.

Prohibitions, restrictions and schematic situation:

Section 72 of the Land Use Act; No building project may be built on a coastal zone belonging to the coastal area of ​​a sea or water body without a local plan or a legally binding master plan that specifically provides for the use of the master plan or part thereof as the basis for granting a building permit. (21.4.2023/752)

The provisions of subsection 1 also apply to a coastal area where planning of construction and other use for the purpose of arranging a holiday settlement mainly based on the shore is necessary due to the construction expected in the area.

Section 57 of the Building Act; For a special reason, a municipality may grant a permit to deviate from a provision, order, prohibition or other restriction provided for in the Land Use Act or issued pursuant to it and provided for in this Act or issued pursuant to it. However, the above provisions do not apply to eligibility requirements, plot division, the need for and conditions for a landscape work permit, or the conditions for placement in a planning area provided for in section 46, subsection 1, paragraph 2, concerning the preparation of a local plan. A permit to deviate from other conditions for placement in a planning area may be granted.

However, the permit referred to in subsection 1 above may not be granted if it:

1) causes harm to zoning, the implementation of the plan or other organisation of the use of areas;

2) makes it difficult to achieve nature conservation objectives;

3) makes it difficult to achieve the objectives of protecting the built environment;

4) leads to construction with significant impacts or otherwise causes significant adverse environmental or other impacts.

There is no valid plan or legal master plan in the area. Therefore, the construction of the area will follow the building regulations of the municipality of Kihniö. Section 7.1 of the building regulations stipulates the placement of buildings in the shore area. The amount of construction under 5000 m2 on a construction site is defined in the building regulations so that the construction site may have a maximum of one holiday home, sauna and storage building, the combined floor area of ​​which may not exceed 125 m2 and the number of floors may not exceed 11/2. The floor area of ​​a separate sauna and storage building may not exceed 30 m2. In addition to the so-called warm floor area, a cold storage space of 30 m2 may be built and a carport of 30 m2 connected to it. The distance of a building other than a sauna from the shoreline according to the mean water level must be at least 20 meters measured from the outer edge of the terrace. The size of the construction site is determined in the building regulations as follows; Outside the local plan area, in a sparsely populated area, the plot size must be at least 3000 m2. When the building is connected to the public sewer network, the area of ​​the construction site may be smaller than the above, but not less than 2000 m2.

Consulting neighbors:

The neighbors have been consulted. Property 250-407-14-69 has submitted a comment on the matter, stating that the construction is remarkably dense and the space is cramped.

Justifications for the requirement for deviation:

According to Section 57 of the Building Act, the municipality has the power to deviate.

The property in question is located on the shore of Lake Nerkoo in an unzoned coastal area, so before processing the building permit, the building right and the suitability of the construction must be examined through a deviation permit.

In the case of the property 250-407-14-67, a negative deviation permit decision was previously made while the MRL was in force, because the construction density exceeds the dimensioning of what can be granted with the deviation permit. There has been no change in the content of the matter, but in practice the decision with the same content is being re-examined. When the Land Use and Building Act was in force, the building right of an undeveloped property in an undeveloped area was examined by means of a base space review. The base space review determines the property division at the cross-section point in time, which has generally been the date of entry into force of the Building Act and Decree on 1 July 1959 and is used in the base space review to determine the building right in undeveloped and undeveloped coastal areas. The premises belonging to the same base space are examined as a whole. Each building site formed in the coastal area reduces the remaining coastal building right of the base space. Building sites located outside the dimensioning area, i.e. more than 200 metres from the shoreline, do not affect the amount of the building right.

The base property of property 250-407-14-67 is property 250-407-14-19(x) Viikeri (modified 9.2.1954). Property Palaneenlahti 250-407-14-20 was divided from Viikeri on 11.3.1963. Property Palaneenlahti II was divided from the remaining property Viikeri 250-407-14-21 on 17.6.1966, forming property Viikeri 250-407-14-23 (x). The properties Haapaniemi 14:26, Silosenkallio 14:27, Rantaketo 14:28, Prunttiniemi 14:29 and Viikeri 14:30(x) were split off from Viikeri on 3 April 1967.

The properties Heinilä II 14:35, Kotiranta 14:36, Ryysyranta 14:37, Runttila 14:38, Hellinkari 14:39, Yrjölä 14-40, Prunttilahti 14:42, Nurmiranta 14:41 and Viikeri 14:43 have been split from Viikeri 14:43. The properties Kaponen 14:44, Tommila 14:45, Rinneranta 14:46(x), Antinranta 14:47, Peltola 14:48, Vinskilä(x) 14:49 and Viikeri (x) 14:50 have also been split from Viikeri 14:30. The properties Vinskilä (x) 14:49 and Viikeri have been divided into the property Vinskilä 14:68 (2.3.2005). The property Viikeri 14:50 has been divided into the property Rinneranta(x) 14-46, which has been further divided into the property Viikeri 14:69 (3.7.2007). The property Ylikoski 14:67 (28.8.2004) has also been divided into the property Viikeri 14:50.

The established dimensioning principle for deviation permit processing is 4-6 building sites/kilometre of coastline. In this case, there is still planning margin for dimensioning, so 7-8 building sites/kilometre of coastline can be used as the dimensioning principle. The base property 250-407-14-19 Viikeri has had a coastline of 1240 metres, or 1,24 km. The actual length of the coastline has been used in the dimensioning calculation, although there is a promontory on the base property's coastline, in which case the so-called modified coastline should be taken into account in the dimensioning.

Dimensioning calculation: 1,24 km mx 6 pcs / km=7,44 pcs (building rights) < 18 building sites used.

Based on the dimensioning calculation, the result is that the base plot has the right to a maximum of 7,44 building sites, or 7 building sites. 18 properties have been divided from base plot 250 -407-14-67, of which all 18 have used the building right. It can be stated that no new construction sites can be granted through the deviation permit procedure, but the right to build on the base plot has been exceeded by approximately 2,5 times. If the matter is examined with the efficiency factor of 8 reserved for the coastal zoning, the corresponding number of possible construction sites would be approximately 10, rounded up. In other words, even when examined using the means of coastal zoning, the construction density on the shore has exceeded in terms of dimensions what could even be granted by the coastal zoning plan. The length of the shoreline of the construction site is also contrary to the minimum length specified in the Kihniö Building Regulations. Section 6 of the Building Regulations. Construction outside the local plan area; 6.1 Construction site; the length of the shoreline of a construction site on the shore of a watercourse that borders the watercourse must be at least 50 meters for the new construction site.

Prepared by: building inspector Raisa Karinsalo-Manninen

Proposal for a decision

Technical committee not in favor granting a deviation permit for the formation of a new construction site and the buildings planned there, because a negative deviation decision has previously been made on November 16.11, 2023, §66, based on the previous dimensioning and the justifications presented in the previous presentation below. The entry into force of the Construction Act has not changed the design criteria for coastal construction.. Additional construction on the shore is contrary to Section 57 of the Construction Act. The construction is contrary to the provisions of Section 6. Construction outside the local plan area, 6.1 Construction site; of the Kihniö Building Regulations. For a new construction site, the length of the shoreline must be at least 50 meters. At property 250-407-14-67, the shoreline is only 36 meters long.

The Technical Committee states that the building right of the property has been examined in accordance with established practice and the instructions of the Ministry of the Environment through a site survey, and the determination of the building right has been carried out using the same criteria as for other similar properties. From the perspective of good administrative practice, it is important that the principles set out in the Administrative Procedure Act and the Constitution are followed in the preparation of the deviation permit decision. This means fair and impartial handling of the matter, hearing the parties involved, appropriate justification of the decision, and the obligation of the authority to act purposefully and respecting the principle of proportionality. Citizens have the right to trust that the actions of the authority are open, fair and predictable, which is a key part of the rule of law and the legitimacy of the administration.

Making a decision that deviates from a previous decision would not be in line with previous decisions and would create an unequal situation compared to other landowners.

Decision

During the discussion, Antti Kivioja proposed leaving the matter on the table, which was supported by Erja Silvennoinen and Niina Sillanpää.

The matter was voted on by a show of hands. Antti Kivioja, Erja Silvennoinen, Niina Sillanpää and Timo Aho were in favor of leaving it on the table.

Ulla Vierre, Mika Shemeikka, Mika Korkiakoski, Petteri Wiinamäki and Tiina Jokioja voted against tabling the bill.

Antti Kivioja's proposal was not adopted. It was decided to continue the discussion of the matter. Mika Korkiakoski proposed, in deviation from the proposed decision, that the deviation be agreed to and Ulla Vierre supported the matter. The chairman presented the voting order; Korkiakoski's proposal was NO, the rapporteur's proposal was YES. A vote was taken; YES votes were cast by Niina Sillanpää, Erja Silvennoinen, Timo Aho and Mika Shemeikka. NO votes were cast by Mika Korkiakoski, Ulla Vierre, Tiina Jokioja, Antti Kivioja and Petteri Wiinamäki.

Mika Korkiakoski's proposal was adopted, meaning that granting a deviation permit is supported.

The rapporteur submitted a dissenting opinion on the matter. Dissenting opinion: The possibilities for coastal construction should be resolved through zoning and not through an individual application for a derogation. In dense coastal construction, construction possibilities should be examined through zoning.

For your information

Municipal board

Section 61 Tasks delegated to the building inspector of the building control authority from 1 July 2025

The Kihniö Municipal Council discussed the administrative regulations reform at its meeting on May 26, 2025.
The Administrative Regulations contain provisions on the general duties and powers of the committees and the duties and powers of the technical committee (section 38).

According to Section 38 of the Administrative Code, an institution may transfer the powers assigned to it in this chapter to a subordinate authority. The authority to which the powers have been transferred may no longer transfer the powers unless the transfer of powers is specifically provided for in these Administrative Code.

The provisions of the Local Government Act (410/2015) apply to the transfer of the competence of the building control authority. However, matters concerning administrative enforcement and claims for rectification may not be transferred to the office holder for resolution.

The following are the tasks and decision-making powers delegated to office holders:

Building inspector

  1. may require a safety report to be prepared for a site that is extremely demanding in terms of evacuation safety (RakL, Section 32)
  2. decides on the granting of building permits for buildings under 1200 sq m, and on the granting of a placement permit in connection with a building permit, Section 43 of the Building and Construction Act,
  3. issues a decision on a landscape work permit, Sections 53-54 of the Construction Act
  4. decides on the granting of demolition permits and processes demolition notifications pursuant to Section 55 and Section 56 of the Building Act.
  5. grants permission for minor deviations in connection with a building permit, Section 59 of the Building Act
  6. handles the consultation and information on the building permit, Section 63 of the Building Act
  7. handles the consultation and information on deviation permits, landscape work permits and construction permits for construction sites located in planning areas, Section 64 of the Building and Construction Act
  8. handle the hearing on the demolition permit, Section 65 of the Building Act
  9. Request statements on demolition and landscaping permits and construction and placement permits from the Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment, as well as statements on deviation permits from the Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment, the museum authority, the provincial council and other state authorities. Building Act Sections 66, 67
  10. to notify permit decisions by public announcement, Section 70 of the Building Act
  11. submit information related to building inspections and building permits to the built environment information system (RakL, § 72, § 73)
  12. issue regulations in the permit decision, Section 76 of the Act on the Protection of the Environment
  13. issue a decision on extending the validity of the permit, Section 77 of the Building Act
  14. issue a decision on the right to commence construction work, Section 78 of the Construction Act
  15. explicitly defines the complexity of the project in Section 101 of the Building and Construction Act
  16. grants permission upon application to use a neighbor's area for construction work, Building and Construction Act, Section 106
  17. issue an order in the building permit to mark the location and elevation of the building on the terrain (Building Act, Section 107)
  18. suspend construction work if the construction project does not have a foreman, Section 108 of the Construction Act
  19. issue an order for the commencement meeting for a demolition permit or construction permit, Section 110 of the Building Act
  20. Requiring a quality assurance report in a construction project Section 111 of the Building and Construction Act
  21. orders other official inspections in addition to inspections, Section 113 of the Building Act
  22. Allowing expert inspection Section 114 of the Building Act
  23. requiring an external inspection, Section 115 of the Building Act
  24. requiring a special procedure Section 116 of the Building Act
  25. Minor deviation from the plan during construction work Section 117 of the Building Act
  26. submission of final inspection and partial final inspection Section 122 of the Building and Construction Act, Section 123 of the Building and Construction Act
  27. ascertaining the non-performance guarantee in connection with the final inspection, Section 124 of the Construction Act
  28. decides on the placement of minor equipment, Section 134 of the Building Act
  29. issues regulations regarding building maintenance, Building Act Section 141
  30. issues regulations related to the completion of construction work, Section 144 of the Building and Construction Act
  31. the right to suspend construction work, Section 146 of the Building Act; the right to carry out inspections and investigations, Section 148 of the Building Act;

If necessary, the office holder may refer a matter that he or she has the right to resolve to the technical committee.

Proposal for a decision

The Technical Committee decides to delegate authority in accordance with the list above. At the same time, the Committee decides that the delegation decision will come into force on 1 July 2025. The Municipal Council has approved the changes to the Administrative Regulations at its meeting on 26 May 2025.

Decision

The motion for a resolution was adopted unanimously.

§ 62 Financial performance 1.1.2025 - 30.4.2025

The technical director presents the financial situation at the meeting.

Accompanying material is a comparison of actual results.

Proposal for a decision

The Technical Committee notes the financial report for the period 1 January - 30 April 2025

Decision

The motion for a resolution was adopted unanimously.

Back